• Log in
Anwen  Share and Create
  • Book
  • Movies
  • Music
  • SF
  • Goodlink
  • Asks
  • Eyeopen
  • Create

Neil deGrasse Tyson is Correct about the Numbers

Sharer: Econlib August 5, 2019 at 10:14 pm
Link Share :https://www.econlib.org/neil-degrasse-tyson-is-correct-about-the-numbers/ - via RSS

Numeracy Matters

Yesterday, science writer Neil deGrasse Tyson tweeted:

In the past 48 hrs, the USA horrifically lost 34 people to mass shootings. On average, across any 48 hrs, we also lose…

500 to Medical errors

300 to the Flu

250 to Suicide

200 to Car Accidents

40 to Homicide via Handgun

Often our emotions respond more to spectacle than to data.

His numbers are roughly correct.

Moreover, his bottom line is important.

The kinds of deaths that gets attention are not always those with the largest numbers of fatalities. All of the causes he lists above have more. Handguns are close but even those are for any 48 hour period and it's unlikely that we will have El Paso/Dayton-style mass shootings every 48 hours. It's precisely the fact that such mass shootings are rare (although, of course, not nearly rare enough) that leads to the publicity they get.

Various people have expressed their upset at Tyson, but when they go beyond upset to actually argue, they typically fail.

For example, one responder wrote:

You can learn from errors

You can heal from flu

You can love life

You can drive safe[ly]

But even if you choose to live a safe healthy life you can do nothing against an American terrorist. You can’t even make a choice because a stupid white virgin boy has decided that you must die.

Yes, you can learn from errors, but that doesn't mean they didn't die. You can heal from flu, but many people, despite often good medical attention, don't. You can love life, but it's not the life lovers who are typically at risk of suicide. And you can drive safely, but that doesn't mean you won't get T-boned in an intersection by some bozo who runs a red. So just as you often can do nothing against an American, or even a foreign, terrorist, you often, despite your best efforts, might get killed by medical error, flu, and unsafe drivers.

Tyson's most important point is his last sentence, and many of the people who are upset at him are proving his point.

The post Neil deGrasse Tyson is Correct about the Numbers appeared first on Econlib.

作者暂无likerid, 赞赏暂由本网站代持,当作者有likerid后会全部转账给作者(我们会尽力而为)。

Tips: Until now, everytime you want to store your article, we will help you store it in Filecoin network. In the future, you can store it in Filecoin network using your own filecoin.


Support author:
Author's Filecoin address:
Or you can use Likecoin to support author:
tags:Behavioral-Economics-and-Rationality Neil-deGrasse-Tyson numeracy risk

0 0

2012-2018 Anwen All of our posts are default licensed under CC BY 4.0 About Help Changelog Telegram
Today Quote: 2006年1月19日,新视野号宇宙飞船发射,飞向遥远的冥王星。经过三十亿英里的飞行,九年后的2015年7月14日11点49点,到达预定地点冥王星。这只比2006年的预测慢了1分钟,达到了99.99998%的准确度。 -- 《了不起的 NASA》