Open Borders in Foreign Policy

I've got a new piece in Foreign Policy, with brand-new illustrations by my collaborator Zach Weinersmith. Highlight:

The standard explanation for these asymmetric public reactions is that resistance to immigration is primarily cultural and political, not economic or logistical. While West Germans welcomed millions of East German migrants, a much lower dose of Middle Eastern and African migration has made the whole EU shiver. Aren’t economists who dwell on economic gains just missing the point?

Yes and no. As a matter of political psychology, cultural and political arguments against immigration are indeed persuasive and influential. That does not show, however, that these arguments are correct or decisive. Does immigration really have the negative cultural and political effects critics decry? Even if it did, are there cheaper and more humane remedies than immigration restriction? In any case, what is a prudent price tag to put on these cultural and political effects?

P.S. I'd love see you at the Cato book party on Monday night!

The post Open Borders in Foreign Policy appeared first on Econlib.